By now, you’ve probably seen the TIME magazine cover featuring a mom breastfeeding her preschool-aged son. It's attention-grabbing… to say the least.
While my first instinct is shock and pity for the future teenage boy who will never live this cover down, I do see the beauty in a mother’s ability to provide food and nourishment for her child – while creating an intense bond. But doing so on the cover of a national magazine seems to objectify the natural sweetness of a tender moment.
But here's what I'm really sick of. I can't take the Mommy Wars anymore. And by asking their audience "Are You Mom Enough?," the TIME editors seem to be feeding into women’s insecurities – which is exactly what gives magazines a bad name. They are pitting moms against each other, when we should be working together as mothers who are inspiring and building the next generation.
Attachment Moms, Working Moms, Stay at Home Moms, Permissive Moms, Tiger Moms, Helicopter Moms… let’s take a stand. Let’s agree to disagree. We all want the same thing. We are working to create well cared for, kind, loving, hard-working children. We want strong relationships with our kids. We want them to respect their elders, say "thank you" to strangers, and give seniors an extra hand. We all want them to feel loved and grow up to give this love in return. We want them to be strong and confident, but listen and learn from an opposing viewpoint. And we want them to know how much we love them.
So whether you breastfeed, co-sleep, wear a sling or push a carriage; whether you work, stay at home, have a nanny, home school, or spank, I am promising that I won't judge you. I won’t judge because I know you are just trying to do your best. We’re in this together. And if we tear each other down, we’re just wasting too much energy. Energy that we could spend on our families.
How does this TIME cover make you feel? What does it mean to be "Mom Enough" in your eyes?
By Month:
All My Links
« The New Mother's Day | Main | What I Never Expected »
May 14, 2012
I'm Sick of It
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b0f069e20167667d4f04970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm Sick of It:
Comments
adlobs_sheila
- Great care starts
with a conversation.Premium Members can:- Send and receive messages
- Access background checks
- View references and reviews
Search Sheila's Blog:
Best of the Blog
- When to Work, When to Stay Home?
Does it make sense (cents?) to work or stay home? - You're Fired
When is it time to fire your care provider? - Homemade Cold Remedies
Fight the flu at home - Advice for Online Safety
Help kids practice "safe surfing" - Interview with a Manny
Hear from a real-life manny



The title of the article was meant to catch your eye and inspire curiosity, which it obviously did. People are always going to compete with each other, its just what we do. Mommy wars aren't going away. If you don't like them, just do what I do and choose not to participate. I parent how I parent and make no apologies.
Posted by: Korin | May 15, 2012 at 07:29 AM
Sorry...but I found this cover shot disgusting. If a woman is still breast feeding a child at this age, then she has some major mental issues....Get real!
Posted by: Anita | May 15, 2012 at 07:44 AM
The times article / cover was inflammatory at best. It's such a shame because it incorrectly references what attachment parenting is. If nothing else - to create more hype.
It's such a weird perspective that people take. Love your kid but not too much. Don't spoil your kid lest they become bad people. Although... If I had to choose between over-caring for my child and neglecting my child.....over-caring is by far the lesser of the two evils. Have you ever met someone that didn't get hugged enough as a child?? It isn't pretty! Now compare that against someone who got hugged too much as a child....or is that even possible?
At the end of the day, while I might not breastfeed my child until 4 - so what if someone does? I seriously doubt that will be the one thing that ruins that child. Breastfeeding is healthy for kids - plain and simple. Even after they are eating solids, breastmilk has all kinds of nutritional / immuno-benefits. Why have we as a society vilified breastfeeding like it is somehow wrong? I guess my little rant here is to say - I just don't understand what he big deal is......
Posted by: Flowerchica | May 15, 2012 at 07:47 AM
Well said and thank you.
Posted by: Rigina | May 15, 2012 at 07:52 AM
Amen sister! You said it just right!
Posted by: Cyp93 | May 15, 2012 at 07:55 AM
Jsut call me Mom. I have been every type of Mom mentioned, as a Mom we all know that being adaptable is one of our many strengths as women and moms. I agree that we have to stop the judgement we wield like a sledge hammer at one another. Remember, our children are watching. Step back and look at the bigger picture, that mom who has made whatever decision is, in the majority of cases, doing what she sees as best for her children. I have many friends; stay at home, working, helicopter, permissive moms, I know them all and learn from their parenting styles. The world we live in is not black and white and our opinions shouldn't be either.. As you support and raise your fellow mommys up, your community is lifted as well. Lovel and support wins every time.
Posted by: Just Mommy | May 15, 2012 at 07:57 AM
That cover was ridiculous and TIME has such low readership , they would do anything to be controversial and to get more to read their nonsense. I was NOT breast fed and consistently I was the only child in school to not have any sicks days in elementary school every year. I was never sick as a kid. I don't believe that it's any better for you than formula and that it's hysteria as usual.
And a 4 year old still breast feeding? Pathetic. 1 year max is good enough. What is she teaching that child. These women are nuts for listening to some pseudo expert on children. I will judge-because this is not normal and its being shoved down our throats and I find that offensive. It only makes me dig in my heels more and all of this consensus science pushes right.
Posted by: Candace | May 15, 2012 at 08:00 AM
Well, said. When I divorced my husband 32 years ago and my daughter was two, I was like a second class citizen. My daughter was in a preschool, while I worked full time, where there were only books and stories of traditional families, with a mommy and a daddy. It was difficult.
I think society has become more accepting of single moms and more understanding of the challenges they face every day.
Posted by: Sandra Kirkland | May 15, 2012 at 08:05 AM
I am a health professional and studied nutrition. I know that there are some mothers (esp. in other parts of the world) that breastfeed their children up to age 3 to 5 ..or even longer. I personally feel it is the right of the Mother to decide how long she wants to breastfeed. However in our culture in the USA it is not common to breatfeed a child beyond age 3 and age 1 being about the avg. time to breastfeed. BUT what I do not like about the cover is the COVER photo. To me the boy is hanging off his mom's breast and looks like he is kinda forced to breastfeed by the expession on his face. Also the mom is dressed like she is going to the gym but posing in a rather "sexy" way. So it almost seems like she is using her sex appeal and putting her kid up on a chair to come up to her breast and demanding her son to "suck"! So it just doesn't "sit" right with me to see a mother and her son posing in this matter. It has nothing to do with breastfeeding or the age of the child for me "per se" because I am for breastfeeding if that is the mother's choice. I just do not like the over sexual overtone and the "Mom Enough" caption. That is just my opinion.
Posted by: Milan Moon | May 15, 2012 at 08:14 AM
Thank you, I appreciate your rebuttal to Time. This time I'm less offended by the cover because a) if my kids can say it, they are NOT doing it and b) I already know (and more importantly my 3 wonderful boys know) that YES-I am Mom enough.
Along with their incredible Dad we provide the best we can for them. WHATEVER that means. If we were living in a house made of cow dung smack in the middle of our neighborhood I'm sure it would raise some eyebrows but that is how people live in other parts of the world.
Point is we try to do the best we can for our family here in our little urban world. It is all relative. We are all different human beings and it is inevitable that what works for one will not work for another. Just like I tell my 3 boys, just because your brother does...doesn't mean you have to. You are 3 different people.
I also feel sorry for the boy on the cover of that magazine…but if he is raised to be a likable adult, GREAT!
Posted by: Jen | May 15, 2012 at 08:15 AM
It means...well, reading fewer blogs, I think.
Posted by: Me | May 15, 2012 at 08:22 AM
I agree with you in almost every aspect except the part about the teenage version of this preschooler never living this cover down. There have been many children on many controversial Time covers over the years, and no one remembers who they are or even what the controversies are, after the discussion simmers down.
I am an extended breast feeder and an AP parent, and I LOATHE this cover. The aggressive stance of the mother, the detachment from her child, the practical dare/taunt in the title... it all rubs me the wrong way. Not to mention, Time seems to have purposely found the tiniest mother with the oldest looking three-year old ever, as though to make a point that all moms nursing toddlers/preschoolers look as though they're nursing third graders. Had the cover had the mom in the manner moms usually breastfeed, sitting down, holding him, it would have been better. However, we still would have the issue of her slowly and that damn headline.
Just one day after a female write in Forbes asked women to stop the Mommy Wars, Time throws down bigger ammo. And we women snatched it up like Tributes in The Hunger Games cornucopia. We can't let them do this to us for the sake of selling magazine covers. We shouldn't do it to each other.
Posted by: Pop Culture Mom | May 15, 2012 at 08:27 AM
Thank you! I wholeheartedly agree. As a new mom, I was inundated with guilt as to whether I was "mom enough" . Books warned of tiny indiscretions I might commit as mom that would permanently damage my child. And my precious first moments with my son were filled with worry that I was doing everything by the book. It wasn't until a fellow mom, told me to "throw away the books", that I was a good mom, and I knew how to do this that I relaxed and settled into being my kind of mom. And now, as much as I can, I want to do that for other new moms. Let's not battle and judge each other, let's support each other. This job is hard enough!
Posted by: Emily | May 15, 2012 at 08:27 AM
Perfection in journalism. Woman eat their own kind. Live & let live. Thank you for your uplifting moment in my crummy day!
Posted by: Theresa Chaffin | May 15, 2012 at 08:29 AM
I totally agree with your point here...but was a bit taken aback by your intro. Despite your urging to not judge, you sound very judgmental of the mom in the picture - even going so far to say that you "pity" her son who will never live it down. Really? I can't imagine anyone caring about this cover 10-15 years from now.
And the picture itself, when you take away the (totally annoying) headline, is actually a really cool picture. I just see a mom who is proud of herself, proud of her choices. And really...what is wrong with that?
Posted by: Shana | May 15, 2012 at 08:29 AM
Anyone who acknowledges "value" in co-sleeping, post-infancy breastfeeding, 'helicopter' parenting and so on as an advocate for wanting children to be 'strang and confident', 'want them to know how much we love them', ad nauseum, has themselves been sorely misled by propaganda hype.
- "We should be working together as mothers ..."
- "We all want ..."
- "We are working ..."
- "We want strong relationships with our children."
EXCUSE ME?!?!?!
Who is this 'we'?
Not once did you mention husbands, fathers, male role models, etc.
Where's the desire for a strong relationship and bonding with your husband? Working together with the father?
You yourself are pandering to the very things you superficially are railing against in this article behind a facade of love and care for kids. Shame on you.
Posted by: Cirila G | May 15, 2012 at 08:29 AM
I can't copy the image URL, so I'll just type it out here. So simple and to the point of how I feel. Credit to unknown author.
Dear TIME,
To answer your question - I AM MOM ENOUGH!
I am mom enough to breastfeed
I am mom enough to bottle feed
I am mom enough to co-sleep
I am mom enough to crib sleep
I am mom enough to cloth diaper
I am mom enough to use disposables
I am mom enough to make my own baby food
I am mom enough to buy my baby food
I am mom enough to wear my baby
I am mom enough to use a stroller
I am mom enough to stay at home
I am mom enough to go to work
I am mom enough to do both
I am mom enough to choose what is best for my family
I am mom enough to raise happy, healthy children.
Thanks a buch for asking
Love,
A mom
Posted by: Angela | May 15, 2012 at 08:36 AM
Thats what I thought. That poor boy is going to have a rough way to go from all the other kids and others in his life. That woman selfishly got that boy branded tittybaby for life
Posted by: Harold | May 15, 2012 at 08:39 AM
I have a 9 month old son and have been practicing alot of the attachment parenting mottos. I exclusively breastfeed, we co sleep, i never allow my infant to cry it out and i responed to each and every cry as immediately as i could. I carry my son alot. Not in a sling but carried him all the same. But he also goes in a stroller. He never took a bottle or pacifier but now uses a sippy cup. He is a bit older and I am now setting up limits. Now if he cries because I have just put up a boundary to keep him safe well then he just cries for a minute. But I do redirect him or try distraction. Then he is fine. I have adopted some AP ideals and some I have not. I do believe in child led weaning but i have a lil foodie becuz i have made organic purees and exposed my son to all kinds of intresting foods. He only initates breatsfeeding in the morning, at nap time, and at night. Other than that he wants the stuff in the kitchen. He even goes to his place space where his "dishes" are and starts pulling them out like he is cooking...that is my cue...mom i want some food. My son in not co dependent and just like any other child we have to practice being apart but he knows mama is there or can be quickly. He trusts me and at 9 months looks to me validation and verification. And he gets it! He is very smart intellectually, above average socially, and very confident. In his lil classes it is obvious he is the leader. He is involved with the other babies, makes immediate eye contact, and is already the teachers pet. I am glad I have raised my son the way I have. AP has been very successful for me as a single mother and I feel I have sown seeds into my son's life. And trust me as a single mother on a fixed income, raising a child literally alone AP has been the biggest commitment I have ever made! I don't follow it to the letter but alot of its ideals have paid off. And me and my son are very much in sync, and have a magnificant bond. This has been my persoan experience and I just wanted to share it. I am sure formual fed babies have the same bonds and skills my child does. No judgement...Just love!
Posted by: Tasha | May 15, 2012 at 08:40 AM
I love what you said....this is exactly how I feel too...I understand how in some countries it is OK to breastfeed till the kid is 8 yrs, I have no issue with that...I have two kids and for reasons I dont wish to discuss, I did not breatsfeed either for more than two months...it was my personal choice and I can tell you, I was judged....by my husband, by friends at work and home, by my pediatrician....I had to keep myself steady and not let anyone affect me....I am a good mom and just because I did not do as they say doesn't change it, I will go to any length to make sure my kids get what they need to be healthy and a good human being.....but each kid is different and so is each mom, we all have our strengths and we should try to use our strengths to get the best for our kids rather than sulking over what we can't do....
Posted by: pkbs | May 15, 2012 at 08:43 AM
Right On, and worry about yourself, who really has time to worry how other people live their lives.
Posted by: Paul Eyler | May 15, 2012 at 08:52 AM
I love your post and think you are exactly right! When I first saw the cover I was upset! If that's what it takes to make me a good mom then I guess I failed! I'm the mommy to a beautiful 3 yeard old boy that I was unable to breastfeed because he was 3 months pemature and my milk didn't fully come in without that close daily contact with him. I wasn't even able to hold him for the first week of his life does that make me a bad mom too? Of course not! I must admit I still haven't read the article and I'm not sure will. My Husband and I are pregnant with out second son (due in August) and I will probably breastfeed this baby if all goes well bit don't feel my relationship with one child will be closer to one child than the other. My kids will both be loved the same, and I don't think my love is dependent on whether they are breast or formula fed, or sleep in bed with us or their own crib, or are cloth or disposible diapered. I don't judge how others mother and don't expect to be judge in return.
Posted by: Amber | May 15, 2012 at 08:52 AM
I personally could care less the approach that other mommies take with parenting, unless, of course, it is harmful to their children.
I believe in raising your children to have respect for their peers, elders & more importantly, themselves.
I believe in raising them to be strong individuals with their own opinion and to be a valuable asset to society, hopefully someday to contribute to their country or something that will make them happy, proud and successful, and not necessarily in the monetary sense.
Time has always taken a more controversial approach in their covers, it is what gives us moms something to talk about ;).
If a woman chooses to nurse their children, hats off to them, but they have no more right to their opinion than I have to mine, and I don't care what anyone says, you are NOT, in this world we live in today, giving your child a lifetime of good health by breastfeeding.
To each her own :)
Make sure your kids are cared for, make sure you give of your time to your children, and be interested in their lives and what they are going through in their childhood adventures.
Feed, clothe, keep a roof over their heads and teach them to respect and genuinely care for others.
You will have a good kid, and a valuable member of society!
Posted by: Colleen | May 15, 2012 at 08:53 AM
Thank you for your comments, well said and I couldn't agree more. It is sad that putting a photo of a woman's breast in a child's mouth is the way media needs to get the hype they need, but then again, what power we women have I guess! I'd like to see what happens if we put a half naked man out there with a little girl sucking on a bottle, probably not much. We women have power even when we think we are being exploited. Women are amazing in all that we do wether it be bearing children or working to put food in our families mouths, you hear more about it when women do it, then men, so in this war, we win. Yay us.
Posted by: Carole Scott | May 15, 2012 at 09:05 AM
I am a mom who breast fed two children. I did it because I felt it was best for my children. I only nursed for 6 months. I did NOT flaunt it or carry on about how fabulous I was for doing it. It didn't make me a better Mom over others who chose not to nurse.
Time, why not concentrate on the children who don't have food in our country? That's something to write about.
Mom's carry around enough guilt, we don't need you trying to make us feel there was something else we should have done better! And as for the Mom who posed for that photo, shame on you for putting your child in a situation that he will surely be ridiculed for in his teen years and as we all know, as a grown Man!!
Posted by: Denise | May 15, 2012 at 09:07 AM
I am a new mom who wanted to breastfeed but was unable to. I worked with my family doctor, my son's pediatrician, and two lactation consultants and was still never able breastfeed due to supply issues, so when I saw this magazine cover I was taken back by it. Not only by the photo (which does seem innappropriate to me) but by the headline. I agree that it was meant to pit moms against each other...like, who is the better mommy? I don't know about other moms, but I find that my mom-friends are a great resource and support system and I don't think we should be comparing ourselves to each other and ,therefore, adding to our daily guilt and stress. Thank you to Sheila for sending this blog to everyone. I am glad to know that I am not the only one that felt that way.
Posted by: jklm | May 15, 2012 at 09:09 AM
It is NOT disgusting to breastfeed a 4 year old. Seriously, women who think that breastfeeding beyond one year is bad (oh hell, most women don't even make an attempt to breastfeed beyond 6 weeks), should go and educate themselves. Read up on the benefits of breastfeeding, and then you'd wish you would have gone the extra mile for your kids.
With respect to different parenting styles, live and let live! Circumstances and beliefs are different, thus parenting styles.
Posted by: Shuchita | May 15, 2012 at 09:09 AM
I am so glad you wrote this because I had the *exact* same reaction. I thought what does this mother's choice have to do with me? Why is this an either or scenario? The title on the cover felt very manipulative. Luckily, I am too busy to worry about whether or not some Time editor thinks I'm mom enough. I want to support parents in their journey, not tear them down. This kind of dialogue doesn't help anyone.
Posted by: Cerece | May 15, 2012 at 09:10 AM
I had such a horrible experience weaning my second daughter that I swore I would never do it again. So with my twin boys, I let them decide when to wean. They were at least 4 and nobody remembers exactly when they stopped nursing--it wasn't traumatic. They never nursed as the picture here shows. They nursed when they needed comfort or to go to sleep. This cover is trying to sell magazines by soliciting controversy and producing a shock effect. That's not the relationship between a real mom and a nursing child at that age. By the way, my baby daughter nursed until about one and stopped of her own accord. Every child is different. It would be wrong to force children to continue nursing after they are ready to stop, just as it is wrong to force them to stop if they are not ready. A mother knows the difference, and it is nobody else's business. I see six year olds carrying around bottles and four year olds sucking their thumbs. Maybe a little longer nursing was what they needed.
Posted by: Ann | May 15, 2012 at 09:14 AM
My second child was 14 weeks premature, and while I ended breast feeding with my first child at 10 months, I continue to breastfeed my second child at 16 months (13 months corrected). Breastfeeding is beneficial and natural. Gods miracle food. It adjust to just what your baby needs. Formula didn't always exist and it isn't good for every baby (all babies can't tolerate it).. To many people in our American culture are closed-minded. In many other cultures in other countries, babies are breastfed for what seems like forever, the children are always kept close to the mother, and may sleep with the parents and/or other siblings. To me, it's just developing a very strong bond. These children are no less productive as adults and in fact may be even more so.
Then today, we wonder why children are so detached and families so separated.
Posted by: Relle | May 15, 2012 at 09:16 AM
I think the topic of breastfeeding should be wholeheartedly discussed, but I agree that the cover picture is appalling. It does seem to have a sexual overtone to it. In our culture sex seems to be everything. That does not go along side breastfeeding! They could've simply had a picture of the two cuddling up to a read a book, esp. using the same title! However, it does grab attention and makes it clear to everyone what exactly the article is about.
Posted by: April | May 15, 2012 at 09:17 AM
See I didn't see this article and cover as asking if I was mom enough to breastfeed, but if I am mom enough to stand up in front of every person in this world and say - "This is what "I" choose to do for MY child. This is MY choice. This is what "I" believe in." The world has gotten extremely judgmental as of lately. And society is attempting to make choices either for us, or force parents - especially new parents - into decisions.
So, to answer TIME's question. YES, I AM MOM ENOUGH to tell the world that...
I Breastfeed, anywhere, anytime.
I believe in child led weaning - had one that was always on the go, he weaned at 15 months. But my two year old, is a different child and still nursing strong.
I co-sleep - more babies die from Crib related accidents each year than co-sleeping. So, yes, I feel comfortable with that choice.
I DO NOT Circumcise. For many reasons - though one being more babies die each year from circumcisions than they do from SIDS, or choking, or car accidents.
I space out my children's vaccinations and some I don't do at all. Not because of media hype and autism, but for the simple fact that I don't believe we have all the facts, I don't believe their little bodies were meant to handle all those chemicals at once, and some I believe weakens their immune system before it strengthens it.
I am mom enough that I would share my beliefs with the world and so go ahead - criticize me, but my child will turn out amazing and yours will learn to be judgmental and not open minded to the beliefs of others.
I am mom enough to say go ahead, ask me anything, I'll happily tell you why it works for me, and beyond wishing that more parents would breastfeed for the 1st year or at least attempt to try and that more parents would realize that circumcision is dangerous and merely cosmetic (and I don't see babies getting nose jobs to look more like dad), that this is what works for me, and it may not work for you. But at least have the courage enough to stand up and advocate for your child and be willing to tell the world...
"I AM MOM ENOUGH!"
Posted by: Christa | May 15, 2012 at 09:17 AM
I do agree this cover was meant to sell copies of TIME. Whether it promotes better parenting is really out of my realm of educated guessing. Parenting is a very individual work of art--- with some consistent key ingredients (conversation, comforting touch, age-appropriate boundaries etc). Each relationship is just as unique as the parent and child going into it and should not be thought of a cookie cutter clones. I think that breastfeeding is a fantastic way to bond but if a Mom or a Mr. Mom was unable to do so, it doesn't mean their child won't be just as attached as one that could.
Posted by: Cypress75 | May 15, 2012 at 09:22 AM
Here's what *IM* sick of... mommy bloggers who can't see past their FIVE minutes of fame to see how what they write/post about their child will haunt them in future years. That cover? When that boy is in middle school, some other boy will find it and he will NEVER HEAR THE END OF IT. Why can't mommy bloggers realize that the internet is forever searchable, people. Just because you want your fame and your crappy free stuff, doesn't mean you ruin your child's middle school social life.
Posted by: michelle | May 15, 2012 at 09:31 AM
Dear Time:
I am mom enough that I chose life.
Sincerely,
A Mom
Posted by: C | May 15, 2012 at 09:32 AM
This cover was meant to sensationalize, nothing more. I wish they would have done a better job trying to educate and shed light on this sensitive subject, but of course nothing matters but dollars...
Just an FYI: I BF my older son till he was 3 (he's now almost 8 - I weaned when I felt we were both ready). I'm currently BF my second son who turned 2 in January. I only discuss it with people if they ask/the subject comes up. It is really nobody's business but mine. Yes, I have breastfed outside, in restaurants and airplanes. I do it discreetly and make no big deal out of it. I have never had a problem.
As to the question: are you mom enough? that does not even warrant an answer. I'm sure a mother did not come up with it.
Posted by: Magda | May 15, 2012 at 09:34 AM
Any woman still breastfeeding a child this old is guilty of child sexual abuse! If a man did something like this with a girl this age he would be in prison!
I saw a video of a woman in England breastfeeding a TEN YEAR OLD!
These women are SICK
Posted by: JEB | May 15, 2012 at 09:36 AM
My only feeling abt "attachment moms" is that if thy continue to breast feed their kids any longer, the kids will end up having severe attachment issues - with their girl friends / spouses later in their lives. They will find it tough to cut the apron strings. The right time to wean would be before they take memories of it into adulthood - so I would say 2-2.5 yrs.
Posted by: D | May 15, 2012 at 09:46 AM
I am so sick of the mommy wars as well. We're all pretty much just taking different paths to the same destination.
Posted by: Alexia | May 15, 2012 at 09:48 AM
I agree that all moms have their own way of parenting and we all need to get along...and butt out, frankly. But honestly, there are situations where I won't let my kids go to a friend's house because of the way their parents behave. I recently had a friend of my daughter's over, and her mom and older brother came. The mom didn't let me know the older brother was coming, and he's 9 and my oldest is 7, so had I known I would have gotten out more age-appropriate things. Anyway, the older child was extremely destructive, attempting to crash my son's bike into our fence, trying to physically reach in our pond and grab our fish, and when his mother said anything to him to try and stop his behavior, he told her to "shut up", called her "stupid", and ultimately grabbed her arm and pulled it behind her back!! He was a very big 9 yr old, as well, so the situation was very disturbing to me. Also, the daughter kept throwing fit after fit, wanting to pull my daughter's clothes out of her dresser and closet and "try them on" (not the "dress-up" clothes, the princess dresses, etc., but her actual clothing)...and continued to throw a fit until her mom actually looked at me and said, "Can she just get some things out?" O_o.
I'm not judging her....she's obviously in a tough situation with their father deployed right now and she needs to get a grip on discipline in that house. When your children are telling you to shut up and physically attacking you, there's a major problem. But while it's her issue, I'm also not going to allow my child to go to their house and #1) be around a child like that brother who is physically combative and may hurt younger children and the mom obviously can't stop him and #2) learn that throwing a fit and calling your mother names is the way to get things.
Obviously all moms need to respect one another's decisions and methods of parenting, but isn't there a point when it would be HELPFUL to confront a mom? I'd like to help this mother out, but I'm afraid if I say something she'll just get offended and stop speaking to me. She obviously needs some assistance, particularly with the older one, so can't moms also speak up to assist one another? Not judging is one thing....going silent while real problems are going on is totally another thing.
BTW, I breast-fed all three of my kids, but not for the whole first year. To judge a mom over breastfeeding, co-sleeping, those things are intensely personal and should be no one's business, IMO.
Posted by: Melissa | May 15, 2012 at 09:48 AM
Everyday I work with kids in foster care, whose moms were not mom enough to simply be a mom, due to addictions, laziness, or just plain lack of caring. That is why this caption irritates me, no matter how you choose to raise your child, the fact that you are present and nurturing in whatever way you see fit, makes you mom enough.
Posted by: Melinda | May 15, 2012 at 09:48 AM
I don't have much of an opinion on this except that it's typical sensationalistic journalism, but I did want to offer some advice to moms who have trouble with milk production. I nursed for 2 years and worked full time, so I did a lot of pumping in the early months. My midwife told me to drink fenugreek tea, and it really works! It's a common herb in Africa (where they do nurse for many years). I didn't buy the pre-packaged stuff - just bought it from the bulk section of the grocery store and steeped a couple of tablespoons in hot water. It doesn't taste great, but works very well and quickly. Mother Nature always provides!!
Posted by: Jen | May 15, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Why are we afraid to ask ourselves if we're mom enough? We all take our role as MOM seriously, and we're always striving to do better -- FOR OUR CHILDREN. Not pitted against other moms. We are professionals, wives, active citizens, whatever you identify with, we should always asking if what I'm doing is enough, what can I do better? So I don't think it's offensive to ask ourselves if we're doing enough. I'm a new mom and always learning and looking for new ways to improve for my baby. It's important to be proud of your best and but the moment we stop asking ourselves if we're doing enough, we become complacent.
That being said, the photo is a gross distoration of an act of love in feeding your child and totally distracts from the really important topic of attachment parenting.
Posted by: Jo | May 15, 2012 at 10:07 AM
This is perfect! As a first-time mom to a 10 month old...I am definitely not "mom enough" according to societal standards, but in my daughter's eyes, I am. She loves me and is well taken care of and nurtured. Who really cares how I choose to raise her (aside from my husband)? My child, our lives. It shouldn't affect the naysayers.... so to heck with other people and do what's best for you and your child/children!
Posted by: Trish | May 15, 2012 at 10:08 AM
At what point does this become sexual abuse? Absolutely ridiculous!
Posted by: Jenn kornbrek | May 15, 2012 at 10:08 AM
As a woman who is 36 weeks pregnant with her first child, I find the simple question, "Are you mom enough?," quite degrading. First-time moms have enough brewing in their minds and to ask that question is insulting. I have yet to meet my new bundle of joy and people are already questioning my parenting and motherhood? I'm going to do the same as my mother did, the best damn job that I can. Her love and support still carries me today and I never once thought about the fact that I wasn't breastfed. Women should do what they feel is best and go with it. Period.
Posted by: Angela Repke | May 15, 2012 at 10:11 AM
I am a father of a six months old daughter, and I believe in the values of breastfeeding. However, I think this particular article or cover has nothing to do with the subject.
Women must once and for all agree not to be objectified for corporations to make money. This woman in the cover looks like a porn star on the job. Replace the child on the chair with a grown man, and the picture will be utterly offensive for everyone. Except of course for Playboy readers...How many mothers around the world look like this?
Let's not avoid dealing with the obvious issue: Corporations cannot make money, unless they undress women and make them feel like they (women) don't have any other value than their sex appeal and breasts...
The most saddening thing for me is that women always fail to see that and focus on fighting against each other...All the time.
A father who vows to raise and smarter daughter.
Olivier.
Posted by: Olivier | May 15, 2012 at 10:11 AM
If you want the "Mommy Wars" to go away then agreeing to disagree is not enough. "Agreeing to disagree" is what people do when they decide the other person and position is not worth their time. There are many different ways to raise a child - some will formula feed, some will breastfeed and formula feed, some will breastfeed only for a month or two or a year or 4. Instead of agreeing to disagree SUPPORT EVERYONE! Of course, breastfeeding is best but formula is very good too. My question for you all is "Are you MOM ENOUGH to recognize that being a mother means doing what is best for YOUR child?"
I am an extended nurser, by the way. My three kids have nursed 3 years, 2 years and 3 years 364 days. *smile* No way would I have posed for a picture like that BUT do you know something? Half the time when I nursed the older children - cuddled up to me and NOTHING visible - I would get looks that made me FEEL like I was doing what that woman was doing. I LOVE the picture. You know why? Because I would like to ask you: when have you ever seen one of us DOING that? Never! But it made me realize something: why should I feel like discretely nursing my 2 year old was like that? why do people feel a need to make others feel like they are sinful for um, nursing?
The answer is that we don't. We do it out of our own insecurity. What that woman did was in our faces yes... but why should it be? Shouldn't we question why we are bothered by it? Honestly.. the only thing sexual about the picture is that it has a confident woman on the cover... she is not moueing at the camera or touching herself or doing anything other than saying, I will not be ashamed of this.
So, formula feeders STAND UP like her: say it together - I will not be shamed!
Combo feeders and Pumpers - STAND UP like her: say it together - I will not be shamed!
BFers: say it together - I Will not be shamed!
If the child is being hurt, STAND AGAINST IT! but if it is just a different form of feeding, love, nourishing, etc... Why can we not do more than "agree to disagree"? Why cant we support each other? I don't get it.
Posted by: Heather | May 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM
TIME should be ashamed of themselves ...... and shame on any of you that put into question a woman's right to breastfeed their child!!! No woman would force their child to stand on a stool to bf so that is my number #1 irk about this cover. Breastfeeding is nurturing, nutritional, free, and controlled by the mom. And to whoever said this is sexual abuse needs to get a freaking clue. I will not judge a mother for making a choice to bf that long...... I had every intention on breastfeeding my son until he chose not to anymore, but alas was not allowed that luxury. And bottom line, when society is more accepting of those stupid teen mom and 16 and pregnant shows than a woman breastfeeding her 3 year old child, we have failed miserably.
Posted by: Michelle | May 15, 2012 at 10:26 AM
If you're not judging re-read your first paragraph. This is exactly what Time's wanted. Keep your mouths closed and raise your kids the way you want. How about if you're choices were put in light and then blew up by everybody who disagreed with you. LET IT BE FOR HEAVENS SAKE!
Posted by: Cindie | May 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM
I'm sorry but i find that cover a bit disturbing. I think people forget that when children start eating solid food they do not need the nutrition from the breastmilk. It's sad to see that moms who breasfeed that long are actually ok having their child who understands suck on their breast. I believe it should not go beyond age 1.
Posted by: Larisa | May 15, 2012 at 10:39 AM
I'm not buying it. I'm not reading it. I hope enough people do likewise that the dinosaur of TIME magazine can be relegated to the museum of thoroughly forgotten print media history.
Posted by: Charlene | May 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM
The photo and the caption (while neither are in good taste) are meant to catch your attention, which they do.
What they do NOT do is depict what breastfeeding really is: providing nutrition for your child, no matter what the age, the bonding between mommy and baby that is irreplaceable.
There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with the reality behind this picture; women should nurse their children as long as possible. Numerous studies have shown the benefits of breastmilk, even up to the age of SIX! Phew, I don't think I could have stuck with it that long, but is is common is many other countries.
HOWEVER, the context of the photo and the caption are meant to stir up tempers. So as long as women (from both sides) are dialoguing and even arguing about the topic, the editors have achieved their purpose.
Posted by: Kendell | May 15, 2012 at 10:47 AM
When I opened my email this morning an saw an email from Sheila Marcelo (who?) and the subject line "Why You Are "Mom Enough""...I was curious. What I wasn't expecting was for the founder and CEO to use her company care.com as a platform for an opinion piece on a controversial (still don't understand why) magazine cover. I am beyond irritated. I don't mind getting emails and even blog entries about stuff that would be related to the COMPANY...not off the wall opinion stuff from the CEO. If you have a personal blog site...use that, it's more appropriate. Sheila is feeding into the "mommy war" hype by using words such as "pity" and "What does it mean to be "Mom Enough" in your eyes?"...the article is so hypocritical. With our attention spans...this will be long and forgotten within the week and everyone will jump on another bandwagon to share their opinion with the world. In the meantime...I will be adding this company to my "do not use" list, because frankly, I think it's ridiculous to keep the churning the pot when you really don't have anything worthwhile to say on the subject matter and you're really just pitting women against each other...may not have been the intention, but read the comments. And to any mom who judges another...I would love to be a fly on your wall for 24 hours and see how "PERFECT" you do things...
Posted by: Jen | May 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Everyone needs to chill out and relax. Go back to parenting your children and not spending more time talking about the cover. Unfortunately, because of the cover, many people stopped there and did not go on to read the great article with an open mind. As a therapist, attachment parenting is wonderful, as are other ways to parent. For the breastfeeding issue! Please, please, pleae, stop discriminating and blaming mothers who decide to do what is best for their children by breastfeeding. Why does the opinions of the USA have to be right? If anyone out there who wants to say, this is gross, or this is abuse....do some research and have your facts straight before you open your mouth! There have been more deaths and illnesses from formula and cribs! Look it up! The research and facts are there about breastfeeding. The WHO reccomends at least 2-3 years and the APA is concidering changing their reccomendation to 2 yrs as well!
Posted by: bigmomma | May 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Here's some harsh judgment for you: You can tell how rational, kind and well-balanced a person is by how strongly they react to this issue. The more strong and defensive the reaction (e.g. "These women at SICK" "At what point does it become sexual abuse?" "I wasn't breastfed and I was healthier than any of my friends at school"), the less sane the person.
Chillax people!
Here's something to gross out the anti-BF crowd and to amuse the rest of you. I stopped BFing my son around age 3 when he began to use me as a beverage. He would eat a cookie and then want to wash it down with breast milk leaving me with sticky crumbs on my breast. Yuck! I showed him how mother cats wean their kittens (we had recently rescued a mother cat). When she got tired of nursing she kicked and gently bit her kittens whenever they tried to get close. He thought it was funny when I would pretend to do the same to him. Over a couple of months of joking around like that, he eventually self-weaned.
I'll bet there will be some grossed-out or horrifed responses to this post.
I hope not - we have so much more to offer each other as mothers. I am cool with any mother who is doing her best and being her most loving self with her children. We all doubt ourselves sometimes as moms, it comes with the job. We really don't need anyone else to pile on. Judge not lest ye be judged.
Having said that allow me to apologize for my initial harsh judgment. I guess you guys are trying your best too. My bad!
Posted by: Motherhood and Apple Pie | May 15, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Everyone on here is feeding into what you say you are standing against. Just responding has put peoples opinions against each other, creating friction and the feelings of being personally attacked. It seems that in motherhood everyone wants their way heard and then justified. With the cover of "helping one another". Feel comfortable and strong in yourself and your own abilities, within your own family dynamic and support system - who cares what others think or feel or do.
Posted by: human compatible | May 15, 2012 at 11:11 AM
I have no issues with the picture, other than I think they chose that one for the most "shock" value.
what I really take issue with is the "mom enough" statement. I detest the mommy wars, having been on many sides in many different "roles" as mother. I really do wish we'd all just agree to disagree, to quit judging each other, but instead to SUPPORT each other. As you said, we are all just trying to do our best, but when we are constantly told that our best is really the worst, how are we supposed to feel? Just because I breastfed my son until he was 18 months, in some eyes I did wrong because I did so too long, and in other eyes I did wrong because it wasn't long enough!! But for us, it was *just right*.
Stop hating on each other, start LOVING. Isn't that what we want our kids to do? To be accepting and loving of others?? We need to start setting a better example by accepting and loving others ourselves!!
Posted by: Katy | May 15, 2012 at 11:24 AM
I didn't read the comments above, so I wouldn't be influenced... I say "ROCK ON" breast feeding mom! You look damn good and you have the balls to still be breast feeding your kid (who no longer nurses for nourishment). Being a mother who breastfed my first child until 18 months you would not believe the stares, comments and rudeness of strangers and of family for doing so. Every woman should have the right to raise and care for her child in any way she likes, and yes because we as mother all want the universal ideals for our children. I am not at all offended by this cover. To me it shines a light on what people are not saying (at least to one's face). I remember when breastfeeding was taboo and now it's like you are horrible if you don't give your child the best- meaning breast milk. Either way, one needs to do what is best for their family as a mom and as a couple- when it comes to not only to feeding, but sleeping and working as well. I like the idea that Time posed the question, and where else are these Mommy wars happening?
Posted by: Sandra | May 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM
Whenever I compare myself to other people, I tend to find myself lacking. There will always be someone more _____ (you fill in the blank). If I try to shore up that particular area in which there is some perceived lack - next week there willsobs some new area that is highlighted, and off I'll go again on the never ending pursuit of "enoughness". This is a "no-win" situation, so I try to stay away from this game. The Truth is I am enough right now. Am I perfect? No - one of us are! But I am enough, and you are enough, and she is enough, and he is enough. I am. It talking about those parents whose behaviors are actually causing real harm. I'm talking about those parents who love their kids and do the very best they know how. Those parents who make honest mistakes, who make the necessary corrections, those parents who give all they have for those they love.
This is controversy for the sake of selling magazines - not an honest assessment of parents or different parenting styles. During mother's day week, Time magazine could have chosen to honor mothers and fathers too, acknowledging the increasing challenges we all face everyday to do right by our families. Instead they chose to reare. Ontroversy to increase magazine sales. I don't fault them - this is their business. But let's it confuse it for anything more than it is.
Posted by: Christina Willis | May 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM
I completely agree with the Dad that commented on this as a media marketing strategy. Corporations will stoop to any level to gain eyeballs and TIME has done just that. Shameful.
Regardless, I agree with Sheila about the strength in unity. Strength is NOT JUDGING another Mom. Not merely ignore the competition / judgmental attitude, but go that additional step to accept other Moms, including the choices they make. I am sure it would lead to an enriching society.
Posted by: MomWithaDot | May 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM
I think breastfeeding is wonderful. I do believe in modesty and privacy though. I think women should be allowed and comfortable breastfeeding anywhere, but I think they should be as discreet as possible. Just as I believe women should be modest in dress when they aren't breastfeeding. I also believe it is best for kids to be weaned from bottles and breast shortly after 1 yr of age. I really don't think babies need to drink a bottle after 1, my own children threw it on the floor after taking a couple of sips. They were too interested in discovering the world to sit and drink a bottle for too long after one because they were being nourished with solid food. I think we are creating kids who are less independent by carrying on bottles and breast past one. I don't think a 3 yr old should have a bottle, so it follows, I don't think they should have breast either.
Posted by: Kathy Przekwas | May 15, 2012 at 11:59 AM
The cover makes me cringe. I just feel bad for the poor boy who'd never be able to get away from the shadow of this cover.
Where has respectable journalism and news-reporting had gone to? And where are the child rights advocates? I know it's breastfeeding, but this image is meant to sensationalize with the use of a minor.
Posted by: PJ | May 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM
I agree whole heartedly. This war against women and the seperation from each other is nothing more than a divide and conquer tactic . We need to stand togwther as woman and mothers. We can not be judging ourselves and others through the mysongyisttic view of patriarchial tyranny.
It takes a village to raise a child. Let's come together and heal this disease that has plagued our world for so long. We are the sustainers and nurturers of the earth. Let's love ourselves and our bodies and beings together with our fellow sisters. We are that powerful.
Posted by: Christine Rasero | May 15, 2012 at 12:06 PM
i think its sick. that child is too old to be breastfed and he will never live that cover down. i get they wanted to attract attention but this is just wrong. if your child has teeth , is potty trained and preschool then that child shouldnt be sucking your breast. i can only imagine what his child will grow up to be like. how long does she plan on doing this? does the kid get a say so?
Posted by: natalie norris | May 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM
Thank you so much for posting this blog. This article and cover were meant to divide us yet again on another topic of "how best to parent". While I would not choose to breastfeed my child past 1 years old, I realize that child rearing is all about choices. As a mom, I am often worried whether I am making the right choices and am finally realizing that as long as I surround my children with love, then you can never really make a bad choice. What this article did do, was make me look for other opinions on the matter, just so that I could understand both points of view. It doesn't seem that these women breastfeed for the nutritional value of the breastmilk, but more for the nurturing and bond it brings, as well as that the child is soothed by it. We all nurture and soothe our children in different ways. This isn't the way that I would choose to do it, but then again, some parents wouldn't make some of the same decisions that I would. And its all about choice, right?
Posted by: Jennifer | May 15, 2012 at 12:19 PM
While this cover might bring up concerns/questions as to why a mother would choose to be breastfeeding a child this age. I feel the real question/concern should be why is this on the cover of a major magazine. Has the media/marketing industry gotten so uncreative that in order to sell magazines they have to stoop to something so distasteful as this. It is inappropriate to say the least. What's going on with the world?
Posted by: Deborah Rhouili | May 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM
It's none of our business. What I find funny is why any one cares. This is what CNN wants, people talking about something that doesn't matter instead of the homeless and people dying from lack of access to health care.
Posted by: Jim | May 15, 2012 at 12:30 PM
I am disgusted by this! I am a new mother and I think this is appalling. At 3-4 years old, the child should be able to hold his own bottle, spoon, fork, etc. This is a selfish act by the mother and I literally had to turn the magazine upside down, so I didn't have to look a the picture. Gross. How is that not molestation?
Posted by: NewMommy | May 15, 2012 at 12:44 PM
I am an advertising professional and think the cover did a great job at selling magazines- the ultimate goal. I was disappointed after reading the article inside, which in my opinion, fell flat. However, the emotionally charged mommy reactions as a result of the cover do help tell a great story:
While I agree 100% that it is about not judging other moms, the outcome of this article more so points out that we need to be much more CONFIDENT in the choices we make. We (moms) need to understand that the choices we make are right for us and not necessarily everyone else, and that's okay! We need to not be influenced by others that disagree or make different choices. And in the end, if we are still bothered by other people's comments and other people's choices, we need to re-evaluate just how confident and right we feel about the decisions we are making.
I am a working mom and I'm okay with that! I breastfed for 10 months and in 2 months the boy is getting cut off! And I'm okay with that! When his toys fall on the floor almost anywhere, I don't abide by the 10 second rule, I abide by the 3 minute rule and I'm okay with that too! Point is, these are MY choices and I feel good about them otherwise I would not make them.
I don't need other women's support or society's support. All the support I need is my little guy's smile...if he smiling then all is right and good in the world.
Posted by: Macki Mom | May 15, 2012 at 12:47 PM
I'm with you - sick of it. The whole "supermom" thing is just another way to separate women - as if there isn't enough. I'm disappointed that TIME has gone this route. I'm suppose to think of it as a serious news magazine?
To me, being a mother is a ministry to which we are called. Each child requires a bit different approach but as a mom, we have to remain who we are so the kids know they can count on us. Or we can go to the next shiny object which is suppose to make us a "better parent"... or make us "better than her".
Allowing the media to manipulate us is the worst example we can set for any child. Learn and grow and change - motherhood does that. But be true to what you know to be true. Basics, like love and discipline always work.
Posted by: KJ Lange | May 15, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Thanks for posting. The Time cover is a mind f### in many ways. 1. Moms feel all kinds of real and false guilt enough: we don't need Time shoving it down our throats. 2. Because there is no motherly love in this photo (snuggling, cradling) it is meant to be sexual: its meant to make you have to think too hard about the subject. 3. Maybe the cover is not so much about parenting as much as it is meant to say, "you are going to be sucking off the govt for the rest of your life!"
PS. nursed my first four kids, couldn't nurse my fifth child b/c she's adopted. Love them all, and they all love me. End of guilt!
Posted by: Deirdre | May 15, 2012 at 01:18 PM
I had a hard time with the visual aspect of this cover. If this photo is to demonstrate what attachment parenting is...Time got it wrong. Where is the attachment beyond this little boy hanging off his mother's breast. Both are disengaged with each other how is this attachment? Especially, if you look at from all the reputable researchers (in history) on attachment (Ainsworth, Bowlby, Gerber) they would be appalled at this. Attachment is not just about breastfeeding! It is all about how parents respond to their child's needs whether it be emotionally or physically. Attachment is about caring and loving responsivness to your child and being able to read their cues and responding accordingly.
Don't get me wrong...I am an advocate for breastfeeding. Their are nutritional benefits that far out way formula and there are numerous medical studies done on breastfeeding vs. formula (if interested go to google scholar to look up actual studies). There are numerous personal accounts of people who were formula fed and were healthy. It is important for everyone to know that studies deomostrate facts that can be related to the "general population". There will always be those who fall on either sides outside of the "bell curve".
Enough said on that, but what this article seems to be about is "emotional benefits of Breastfeeding", not attachment parenting.
Kudos to all you moms who use their intuitive nature to parent their children and not allow outside media to tell you that it is not enough. As any parent knows...noone knows what your child needs the way you do. So keep strong and keep listening to yourself. YOu do have what it takes and you are enough...even if you choose not breastfeed!
Posted by: Coloradomommy | May 15, 2012 at 01:20 PM
I totally agree. Every mom according to me wants the very best for her child and whatever ways and strategies she adopts to help move towards that goal should be left to her discretion. She should be referred to as a mom and not branded with different names based on what rules she makes or what consequences she gives to her children. Moms in today's world have enough battles to deal as it is from their environment while raising ttheir children. So being picked and torn apart for every single thing they do through their efforts is the last thing they ever deserve!!
Posted by: Jo | May 15, 2012 at 02:24 PM
I usually think more diplomatically - try to see all sides. In this case, there is no good reason for people to have such a problem with extended breast-feeding. What is it hurting? You people who get all riled up against it just show your ignorance and/or your sexual insecurities. Most of the rest of the world breast-feeds for much longer than we do here in the U.S. The World Health Organization recommends two years, and many people in other cultures breast-feed much longer. People want breasts to be purely sexual, but they're not. They're as much or more for growing children as they are for sex. Quit attacking mothers who are doing what they think is best because you can't separate breasts from sex.
Posted by: Jill J. | May 15, 2012 at 03:29 PM
why can't they pump and "bottle" feed? If it is for the nutrition. I think we can find other ways to bond after a certain age. (This from someone who has a degree in family therapy.) I could only breast feed for 3 months and that was pushing it, just could not produce the milk. I feel very bonded and connected to my child. There are other ways to bond.
Posted by: ...a mom | May 15, 2012 at 03:55 PM
I completely agree with not feeding into the mommy wars, but I was a bit offended by this post (& by several of the comments). It's great to say that you're not judging other mothers, but when you start out the post saying you pity this child it's kind of judgey. I am an extended breastfeeder (my son is 2 1/2) and I firmly believe in it. However, I know plenty of moms who never breastfeed and I completely support that too; each mother and family has to make decisions that are right for them. I agree that the photo is not great since it's purpose is to be in your face and not accurately represent what it's like to breastfeed an older child, but that's a stupid marketing decision by a crappy magazine.
Formula feed if it's right for you; breastfeed if it's right for you, but please don't judge me or my children. Many of the commenters insist my son will need therapy because I'm still breastfeeding, but I was breastfed 'til I was 2 1/2 years old (my brothers breastfed until a similar age) & guess what? I'm a perfectly healthy, happy mother with a college education, law degree, and happy marriage. I'm not a serial killer or socially stunted; I never needed therapy and I'm very thankful that my mother chose to breastfeed and did it for as long as she felt was right.
Posted by: Sarah Parisi | May 15, 2012 at 04:18 PM
RIDICULOUS! ARE YOU MOM ENOUGH FOR WHAT? I'D LIKE TO SEE THE "ARE YOU FATHER ENOUGH?" COVER - HOW WOULD THAT BE PORTRAYED? STOP THE INSANITY. I AGREE, SHEILA, WE'RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER.
"Working Mother" is a misnomer. Do we say "Working Father"? Why not? Working and Parenting are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. "Working Woman" is more appropriate. If you are a mother, you are a mother, mother, mother, mother, period, whether you work or not.
What's the point of girls studying in school, going to a good college and paying thousands of student debt if they are going to graduate, get married, and quit working? The point of college is to get trained to do a JOB not LIVE. How do I look my daughter in the eye and tell her "study hard!" if she's never going to work? She'd be better off investing the college tuition!
THE POINT IS.................OUR WORLD NEEDS MODERN SOLUTIONS TO WORK SCHEDULES AND DAYCARE AND NANNIES AND COMMUNITY STRATEGIES SO WOMEN AND MEN CAN PURSUE FAMILIES AND CAREER PURSUITS WITHOUT "GIVING UP" ONE OR THE OTHER. I KNOW SO MANY "STAY AT HOME WOMEN" WHO ARE READY TO PULL THEIR HAIR OUT, ARE SO BORED, AND LOVE THEIR CHILDREN AND THEIR HUSBANDS AND CANNOT FIND A WAY OUT!
WHY ISN'T THERE A TAX WRITEOFF FOR DAYCARE MORE THAN $5000 PRETAX BENEFIT? HOW ABOUT A COMPANY TAX WRITEOFF FOR OFFERING A 3 OR 4 DAY WORK WEEK TO WORKING PARENTS (NOT JUST MOTHERS, PARENTS!) THERE ARE SO MANY CREATIVE WAYS TO REWORK OUR TAX CODE TO HELP ALLEVIATE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF CHILDCARE SO PARENTS CAN BOTH WORK IF THEY WANT TO.
Posted by: Wendy | May 15, 2012 at 04:24 PM
I have to say that breastfeeling IS best but if you have to use formula that is ok. If you read the research it shows that the average age for natural weaning is 4 years old world wide. We just happen to live in a society that doesn't value it as much and in fact thinks it is "strange" to breastfeed beyond one year. There is nothing wrong with breastfeeding as long as both the Mother and the child want to continue.
Posted by: Sarah | May 15, 2012 at 04:59 PM
Really quick: someone posed the question "is it possible to hug your children too much?" Listen, I've known people who were neglected and I've known people who were coddled too much, and neither made for a pretty sight. On one hand, you could possibly have difficulty relating and bonding to people, be abrasive or harsh in your relationships with others etc... On the opposite end of the spectrum, you've got kids who think they are entitled to everyone's undivided attention, who think it should be about them and their wants and needs all of the time, and have a total meltdown at the slightest crease of the eyebrow. Yes, I've known and cared for several children like that.
But those are isolated incidences that we can't truly base our parenting on, right? I mean, ultimately, we have to educate ourselves as best we can and do what we think is best for our individual and unique children.
As for the cover of the magazine: I'm all for making people uncomfortable and challenging current perceptions and thoughts, and the cover and title certainly does that. But I agree with the author above who feels like it puts women against one another. It promotes the whole "super mom" concept where you've got to be the perfect wife, mother, and employee out there.
I personally am unable to ever experience what breastfeeding is like, but I feel that I can accurately speak for myself in saying that breastfeeding is definitely something that I think is private, personal, and intimate. Something about the way the woman is positioned and clothed with the older boy hanging from her breast makes it seem like just one more chore that a woman's gotta fit into her schedule. It almost seems disrespectful to women, both those who choose to breastfeed and those who don't. Parenting is exhausting (I'm a foster parent, so I get it, believe me, and there are aspects of parenting that really are a chore (I absolutely hate morning and bedtime routines, and pass them off to my husband as often as I can), but I think that if you've chosen to parent, that your relationship with your child is more than just a checklist on your daily schedule (which, to me, is how I read the picture). And if you are a woman who feels that it's intimate, you've got this very private and personal experience splattered across the front of the magazine for everybody to offer their two cents about. Like I said, I'm all for challenging perceptions and pushing people outside of their comfort zones, but this image does seem a little insensitive.
Posted by: cturentine | May 15, 2012 at 05:08 PM
Hey, if this works for other Moms' than fine. I'm not going to judge them. It logically doesn't make sense if you look at Erikson's stages of development. That being said, the image frustrates me because we don't need to make it harder to breastfeed our children in public.
Posted by: Megan | May 15, 2012 at 05:08 PM
The reaction to the cover annoys me. We are the only country that weans as early as we do. Why? Because the breast are sexualized. So it is "pervert" or "a sin" to use our bodies as God intended. The cover has made it hard for me to nurse my 7 week old in public because of peoples stares. I have decided that every bottle feeder that stares at me (several friends) I am going to "ew" and act like the have three eyeballs everytime they pull out a bottle and tell them it offends me and to put it away. It is every moms choice how to feed her child. There is not right or wrong way!
Posted by: Sarah | May 15, 2012 at 06:05 PM
Lets get real here, this pic is offensive. Since when does 'parenting' involve pitting people against each other? The real question a parent should be asking is "is this whats right for the child" or "is this what easier for me!". I think people forget what's actually best for the child! Who really cares how long a child drinks breast milk? If its good for them & you can supply it, than more power to you. But is it easier for you & healthy for an older child to breast feed? Why can't a mother pump the milk & serve the child in a cup. It seems to me that this is more of an insecure mom issue not wanted to allow the child to become more independent. Cut the umbilical cord already! You can still have a loving moment with your child, giving them the nutrition you believe is best without 'your' needs being involved.
Posted by: Joylin | May 15, 2012 at 07:28 PM
Nothing short of child porn.
There's a certain age when breast feeding turns into incest.
If Time was trying to "shock", well this cover does it!!!!
I will no longer support Time/Time Life
Posted by: Lynn | May 15, 2012 at 07:58 PM
I actually READ the article, and while the cover is sick the article was well balanced. The author actually made the point that there is no basis in Dr. Sears junk science e.g. (that by letting a child cry - your are damaging your child's brain). Covers are designed to make you buy the magazine, that's all. If you fell 'less than' because a cover says 'Are you mom enough?' then you need professional help. It is reading books like Dr. Sears 'Baby Book' that gives me low self-esteem, not Time magazine.
Posted by: Cindy | May 15, 2012 at 08:37 PM
She does this to controll how calories are used in her body. So long as she she keeps breastfeeding the pink nose puppies will stay plump she will stay thin and ol junior will get fed to. I can't blame her I guess. as weird as this is.
Posted by: j | May 15, 2012 at 09:10 PM
My concern is this: is this his mom or is he suckling on some woman's breast that he doesn't even know just for a photo shot/money?
Posted by: Debbie | May 15, 2012 at 10:40 PM
So, some people are saying a kid is too old when she/he "can ask for it". A kid asks for food, drink & other stuff & a parent will instinctively give food, drinks, etc. to their child. A child needs to nurse until she/he is ready to wean. So, why allow your child other nurishments she/he wants, but deny breastfeeding? Is it because it's "taboo"? Who cares what others think or say about a breastfeeding child's age. As a parent, I will give my child the best I can & the most of it. If that means until my child is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7...who cares. It's the mother & child's choice. By the way, breast milk never expires, is always available, is at perfect temperature, etc. Sure, there are some instances where bottle feedin is necessary, but formula isn't the only option of bottle feeding.
Posted by: SJ | May 16, 2012 at 12:28 AM
Well I find that as noted by another post, there is definitely sexual undertones. And I do find them to be really sick undertones sending the message that this child is being "force fed" - it crosses the line for me. The past few decades have been a push in our society to never impose guilt on anyone - whether they wanted to marry animal, plant or mineral. People should be able to live and do what they want without without any guilt, "as long as it makes them feel good." What I don't understand is how is it with this overriding mentality, that the role of wife/mother is exempt. We push ourselves to be superwomen only to find that we are always being put through the ever judgmental ringer. The disappointing thing is that WE FALL FOR IT....every time. Women generally have good self awareness and they are always looking to improve themselves even to their own detriment. We need to STOP caring about what others say or impose and learn to rely on our own moral compass. My parents both came from very large, poor families who went through WWII in Greece. They helped raise their own brothers and sisters. They didn't have chores. They had real responsibilities from an early age. And imagine, they didn't need therapy and they didn't sue their parents for forcing them to work and help sustain their families.....at the end of the day they had strength in character and a "true" moral compass and they didn't need anyone to tell them whether what they were doing was right or wrong. Can you believe it!!! They actually were equipped to make this decision all by themselves....simply amazing!! They had what has become uncommon today - "common sense." So let's exercise some ladies....we know what we are and we don't need anyone dictating that to us.
Posted by: Stella Karavas | May 16, 2012 at 12:28 AM
I was shocked to see this in my inbox. As a mother who had no idea what type of mother i would be, having been adopted at 9 days old being the eldest of 4 siblings all adopted out of different families and none as lucky as I to be adopted in at the young age of 9 days, they suffered much abuse and had issues that made life a little wild on my position as a built in babysitter. enough to where my adoptive mother into a lifetime of extended care after having ECT treatments... I have since found my birth mother of which i have a strong bond with alongside my mother who raised me
{on a bottle} and i turned out fine...
I had no plan of ever resorting to c-section after 40 hours of labor and having my first born sucked out of my pelvis thru my tummy. i never dreamed i would have an issue with breastfeeding after that trauma and would wear a necklace with formula around my neck with tubes taped to my nipples to stimulate milk flow while giving him nutrition..
and now almost six years later did I ever PLAN to be still breastfeeding his younger sister who is almost 4 (only before bed while we read books). This is not something I feel I want to flaunt. My close friends dont even know this, for lack of the topic being discussed nor something we do in public anymore. Sure, I battle with the idea society surrounding me has of it being WEIRD and letting it go naturally as her and I {who are the ones concerned} are fine with it. It feels bonding and safe and loving to her and I have a hard time forcing her to end before she is ready, as i am sure she will be soon. We talk about it and think it is almost harder to force stop with communication. Do I feel this makes me "Mom Enough?"..HELL NO! do any of us ever feel like there is nothing we can do better or bad for things we are not doing enough. We all do the best we can and deserve support for all of it. Lack there of is EXACTLY why moms go CRAZY. Support. Support Love Love. Live. Learn. Observe. Listen. We all have strengths and weaknesses. lets illuminate the strengths in each other. Loose the competition.
Posted by: tata | May 16, 2012 at 02:30 AM
I find all of these comments to be interesting... especially the ones from women who abrasively feel that they have the right to tell other women how to live their lives and raise their children. For example, "A year of breastfeeding is enough." Well, it may be enough for that woman and her children. It may not be enough for another child. The thing to remember here is not, "Am I Mom Enough?", but "What is best for my child?" None of our children are "cookie cutter" children. One mother may breast feed a child until he weans himself at 1 and another child until she weans herself at 2. Some children may not want to wean and a woman has to use her best judgement at whether lots of cuddling and hugging will suffice because that seems to be what these children that breastfeed so late are really needing... that personal one-on-one, "only me and Mommy", "tender moments" time. Personally, I wouldn't breastfeed my child at 4, but I'm not going to judge another woman for her choices because I don't know anything about her children, her family, what worked for her growing up, or anything else. I agree. It's time women stopped judging each other and "battling". No one has the right to tell me how to raise my children. I have no right to tell anyone else how to raise their children. Let's encourage each other instead of being critcal, self-righteous and judgemental.
Posted by: Sheree | May 16, 2012 at 06:35 AM
I am a mom of 2 girls .. one being 3 and the other 1. I never breastfed either of them. I know that breastfeeding carries a lot of nutrients for the child. With my 3 yr old, I just couldn't bring myself to do it and she is perfectly healthy. My 1yr old was born 8 weeks early and was just not an option..being in the NICU for a month.. But if a mother does want to breast feed her child as well as breastfeeding them until they are way past the time to do so, who are we to judge them? Yes, it does grabs people attention..just like the mom in "Grown Ups" who breastfed her child until he was 4.. To me, its really none of my business what other moms do. I really only care how my children are.. The picture on Time was disturbing but that's all it was .. Banding moms together and unite?? Really?? I am a mom and I adore my girls. Just like all the other moms out there; whether they breastfed or not .. Who cares if they breastfeed, bottle feed; if they are working moms or stay at home moms.. as long as you love your children, care for your children.. in the end, that's all that matters?
Posted by: Dawn | May 16, 2012 at 09:47 AM
these are personal choice, judgement has no place here.. the picture on time was exaggeration of reality that is normal..
keep in mind people that.. mothers milk is for humans and cows milk for cows..
Posted by: Sahar | May 16, 2012 at 01:06 PM
SENSATIONALISM-Websters defination:The use of strongly emotional subject matter or wildly dramtic style,language or artistic expression , that is intended to shock, startle,thrill excite,etc.
I quit reading remarks after about the 5th one. TIME made alot of money off of this cover as well as the photogapher and people in the picture. Is this really a lactating mother? is this photoshop? Would a real mother exploit such an intimate bonding moment. Let's talk about that.
Instead of talking about when or how long a mother should breast feed. Don't know that the AMA endorsed anything on the subject or even in the magazine. What about that?
Women and/or Mothers are always under fire about something. Powerful or powerless??? Mommy Wars? What coporate drop out thought this up?? Apparently someone who thought we needed to talk amongst ourselves as to wether we are the best. Don't worry about being best. Worry about proper care, nutrition, health care, day care,Good Parenting, Health formation of your children's mental and emotional needs and education, Spritual formation. All in all at the end of the day that is what matters. Is your child safe, secure? Is your home calm and comforting are you doing all you can to be a good parent to your child/ren? You only need to be the best to them, no one else. Tune into your children not your need to be the best in the world that surrounds you.
Mothers should remember that they are shaping the next generation. What you put into them you will get out of them. Remember most of us will be around to see how that turns out.
I raised 2 boys and I am now at age 55 raising my grandson of 23 months. He is truly a blessing from God to me. During the time of raising my boys all I could work on was providing for them and giving them a good home as I will with my grandson. Hope you all will also. Take care of what is important. Get good information from professionals/experts. Listen and compare. Then share with others...another word we forgot the meaning of: Share(SYN)To use, enjoy or possess in common with others and generally connotes a giving or receiving a part of something...here knowledge or experience.
Posted by: Maureen | May 16, 2012 at 03:14 PM
I agree. The photo is absolutely distasteful. By itself, the photo is more related to sexual interpretations than breastfeeding. On the topic of "Are you mom enough?", I believe mothers needs to feel emotionally secure in where they are at during any season in their lives. Nobody is perfect. We all make mistakes.
Posted by: Julie Huey | May 16, 2012 at 06:31 PM
Oh good, so I am not the only one raging on about how much damage this cover does...I get the sensationalism, I get they want to sell magazines but it just sends a terrible message...thanks for being brave enough to call them out!
Posted by: MommyJustine | May 16, 2012 at 10:00 PM
I enjoyed reading everyone's comments and feel I'm in a good group here! I was disgusted with the photo. As Maureen said, it's an intimate moment btwn mother and child, but moreso the question "Are you mom enough?" I certainly was "mom enough" to raise my daughter alone - her father found more fun in being burden-free when she was not even 2 years old. I was "mom enough" to raise her with a value system that includes personal integrity, religious faith and treating all people with respect. I was "mom enough" to work 3 jobs simultaneously in order to support a roof over head and not become homeless (thanks to her father who never paid a dime in support). I was "mom enough" to see her through all her needs and got her through 4 years of college. Those of you who said their question was to incite are accurate and, as a result, it incited me to never buy a Time subscription again. I agree, too, with Anita who feels something is 'off' with the mother to be doing this. Maybe it's more for that mom's enjoyment than for her son's.... perhaps that mom requires more "attachment" to her son and can't quite cope with his natural aging process. There's a lot going on in that picture and behavior that Time disregarded.
Posted by: Minnie | May 17, 2012 at 01:12 AM
It's ok to judge parents. Some really are bad. Got to pay attention so you can notice and do something.
Posted by: Priscilla | May 17, 2012 at 02:00 PM
The photo was bad enough but the caption was what I especially didn't like. Like another mom on this board, I had to have a C-Section (I had planned to be at a birthing center with a midwife). I was also unable to breastfeed without supplementing and finally "dried up" after my child was 4 months old. After my son was born, I found myself without the support of the women in my birthing class because of the emergency c-section/breastfeeding problems...apparently I wasn't good enough to be part of their cool table. It really hurt because my own mother is deceased. I had one woman tell me I never should have had children and another insinuate that I wasn't a real woman/mom because of the c-section. I was also the only woman in the group to go back to work. To see their reactions I might as well have had a sex-change operation while they were doing the c-section.
I know my experiences are limited, but it made me treasure my relationships with my childless friends even more. At least when I'm with them I can genuinely have fun and I don't have to worry about being Mom enough!
Posted by: Kim | May 17, 2012 at 06:14 PM
Thank you, Sheila, for this blog. I wish I had time to read every post but I don't have the time.
Totally agree with Olivier that the picture does not depict breastfeeding. As a man, I would maybe laugh over the image of porn star with non-milk boobs with latched boy who might be doing (or thinking of) anything but feeding. However, the smile on my face would freeze as I realize how much stir up it causes between women, adding fire into Mommy War. Yes, most of the comments are by women.
I believe that there is no universal rigt way of raising children. It is the way parents choose (mother and father) because they think this is the best. We have to be tolerant with different approaches. Any discussions should serve as eye-opening not blaming each other. Thanks.
Posted by: Stan | May 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM